Posts in Legislation
#StopTheShock (by Laura Hatcher)

The following is the transcript from remarks given on 4/24/2019 at the Stop The Shock Washington D.C. Wait-in hosted by The Autistic Self Advocacy Network.

Hello, my name is Laura Hatcher. My son, Simon, and the rest of our family are members of Little Lobbyists. We support Simon in his self-advocacy as a person with disabilities and complex medical needs, and we advocate together to create the kind of future all our families deserve - a future that does not include electrical shock for people with disabilities.

I’m also a college professor and creative consultant and I mostly work from a home office. Sometimes it gets a bit too quiet, so I put the TV on for background noise while I work. One morning fairly recently I caught a bit of a talk show – it’s called “The Doctors” – and I was surprised to hear one of their topics for discussion was the electric shock “therapy” of people with disabilities in use at the Judge Rotenberg Center.

We don’t often hear issues of disability rights in mainstream media so I was pretty interested to see how this discussion would go. As the host introduced the segment and the camera panned the audience I was glad to see the co-hosts and audience members were genuinely surprised and appalled to learn that this barbaric abuse is happening here, in the United States, in 2019.

Then, following the formula of shows like this -- they went on to question the so-called “experts” to learn more.

First, they asked a psychiatrist from a well known university about the practice, who firmly denounced it as torture and pointed out that there are myriad other far better treatment options available to individuals with disabilities and their families.

Next, predictably, they asked a representative from the Judge Rotenberg Center why - if the first specialist was correct -- the JRC persisted in its use of electric shock devices.

The JRC Clinical Director summarily dismissed the United Nations report stating that the use of Gradual Electronic Decelorators (GEDs) is torture. He claimed, that despite evidence to the contrary, they no longer really hurt people. He even claimed that they’d had some success with really tough cases, for problems nowhere else could deal with. As he spoke, I noticed that the way he talked about the people he was supposed to be caring for was dehumanizing. To him, they were cases not community members. They were big, scary problems -- not real, vulnerable people.

The co-hosts and audience members listened to this exchange with furrowed brows. They acknowledged that this was indeed a difficult problem. And then they cut to commercial.

I hoped that, when the show resumed, they’d have included a person with disabilities on their panel to respond. To provide a much needed first hand account of the damage abuse masked as discipline or, more insidiously, therapy, has. To explain that it does not heal anything or anyone. Instead it causes fear, anxiety, and lasting trauma.

But that didn’t happen. Instead they started on a new segment about mites living in eyelash extensions.

“The Doctors” never asked a person with Autism, like my 13 year old Little Lobbyists Simon, who has complex medical needs and physical and intellectual disabilities, what they really needed to understand. They never asked families like mine if the JRC clinical director was disconnected and dehumanizing in his assumptions about our loved ones.

If they had, they would have learned that just being secluded by an aide in school when Simon was in the first grade led to months of acute separation anxiety for him - communicated to us through sudden, painful meltdowns; and to years’ of guilt, fear, and an inability to trust outside caregivers for us, his parents who love him.

They might have learned that many families like mine are desperate, but not in the way described by the JRC clinical director. We are desperate to have the lives of our loved ones valued. To be counted as full members of our communities - the sort of people whose opinion would be worth getting when discussing their lives on a mainstream talk show.

No, they never asked. So we just have to tell them.

We need everyone -- even the talking heads, doctors, and so-called specialists – to recognize that people with disabilities are people and that “behaviors” are communication. We need them to be aware that there are insufficient resources to support people with disabilities in their homes and communities. We need everyone to understand that treating people to improve their health and well-being is NOT the same as shutting them away and shocking them into submission.  

We are here to remind the FDA that every day they delay banning the use of electric shock another person is subjected to treatment the United Nations has classified as torture. We are here to remind the United States of America that the imprisonment and torture of disabled people is wrong.

I sometimes think our government administrators have a lot in common with talk show hosts. They pan the audience for reactions but rarely ask for the input of true experts -- the people impacted. They observe commercial breaks and hope we will simply tune out.

But we cannot change the channel. I cannot bear the thought of a person like my son being tortured for simply being who they are by anyone too lazy, incompetent, or cruel to understand their needs. I know you can’t either.

People with disabilities are still being tortured today. Every moment we are waiting for the FDA to ban this practice is a moment too long. It is time to stop the shock.

To learn more, visit: www.autisticadvocacy.org/stoptheshock/

[Image description: An illustration of a construction site-style metal warning sign. At the top, white text on a red background reads: ATTENTION! Below that is large text which reads: “PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ARE STILL BEING TORTURED AT THE JRC.” Next to the text is a warning symbol depicting a person being electrocuted against a yellow triangle background. Below the warning symbol is text reading #StopTheShock. There is a post-it note on the sign that says #WeAreStillWaiting.]

[Image description: An illustration of a construction site-style metal warning sign. At the top, white text on a red background reads: ATTENTION! Below that is large text which reads: “PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ARE STILL BEING TORTURED AT THE JRC.” Next to the text is a warning symbol depicting a person being electrocuted against a yellow triangle background. Below the warning symbol is text reading #StopTheShock. There is a post-it note on the sign that says #WeAreStillWaiting.]

From Parent, to Advocate, to Leader (by Jessica Fox)
Jessica Fox and her daughter Claire, age 4

Jessica Fox and her daughter Claire, age 4

I am a mom.

When my daughter was born with a heart condition requiring a high level of medical care, I became her advocate.

When I realized there were many kids like her, unable to access the resources they need to survive and thrive, I became a leader.

The truth is, I never thought I would be a health care expert meeting with legislators in our state Capitol, but now I am. Because I have to be.

Too often, our policies on health care are made by people who do not understand what it's like to care for a child who has had more doctor's appointments than play dates. That is why I started speaking up and fighting to change our state law.

I started speaking up because of my daughter, Claire, a very happy four-year-old child. She loves to tease her siblings and will pull out all the stops to make them laugh. She loves music and she loves to play dress up. She currently attends an inclusive pre-K program, where she signs her best friend’s name “poppy” by using sign language for “bubble".

In many ways, she’s just a kid living her best life; but unlike most kids, she has spent more than her fair share of time in hospitals, racking up millions of dollars of medical bills in the first two weeks of her life.

We were very fortunate to be covered by my employer’s commercial insurance plan to pay for her medical care. In addition, due to Claire’s extended hospitalization, we also qualified for our state’s Medicaid plan, called TennCare, as a secondary policy. This was necessary because as great as our insurance was, it did not cover everything Claire needed, like her therapies, medical equipment, and surgeries.

Then, one day, just prior to Claire’s 4th birthday, we lost her Medicaid because we no longer qualified. Just like that. I appealed not once, but twice and lost. How could a disabled child be denied access life-saving medical care in America?

I sat in the grocery store parking lot crying one day, and I knew I had to do something.

I have to confess that a year ago, I had no idea who my State Representative was. We all start somewhere. I began a letter writing campaign and asked everyone I knew to join me.

I connected with groups like Little Lobbyists, a family-led organization advocating for children with complex medical needs and disabilities, where I felt encouraged and a sense of community. I made calls to my State Senator. I reached out to several agencies. I attended health care forums. I took notes as candidates campaigned for the mid-term elections.  After tucking my kids in bed, I spent my late nights reading and learning about our state government. I learned about the Katie Beckett program, a Medicaid waiver program that allows medically complex children to live at home with their parents instead of an institution, by waiving the parent’s income. I learned that Tennessee was the only state in the country without this program.

I told my story in several newspaper and television interviews. This past October, my daughter’s face was the front-page center piece article of our local newspaper, talking about why we need the Katie Beckett program.  I joined four other families with children like mine, and we took off to our state Capitol. That day, my husband and I took our daughters to meet various lawmakers who agreed to sponsor a bill that we hope to become a Katie Beckett program in Tennessee.

I remember we sat in a legislator’s office, next to Claire as she rocked in his rocking chair. When you show up with your kid at the state Capitol, legislators are forced to see them with their own eyes. Claire is not a number or statistic; she’s a real child.

Jessica Fox with her family visiting Tennessee State Representative Sam Whitson

Jessica Fox with her family visiting Tennessee State Representative Sam Whitson

Our bill is now progressing in Tennessee’s House of Representatives. This bill, if passed, will ensure Claire can access the medical care she and so many other kids need and for us, that means we give them every fighting chance to reach her their highest potential.

This is why we need to engage our lawmakers. They work for us. They need to understand how policies affect our lives. We are the experts on our children. We are the experts on policies that affect our children.

We are constituents. We are real people, who care about our loved ones. We are spouses and siblings and friends and neighbors, and yes, we are parents. It is time for us to speak up and lead.

Some of the Tennessee families fighting for a Katie Beckett Medicaid waiver in their state.

Some of the Tennessee families fighting for a Katie Beckett Medicaid waiver in their state.

JessicaFoxUnrig.jpg
All must mean ALL – Little Lobbyists Statement on Universal Health Care Policy (STATEMENT)

Little Lobbyists believe that health care is a human right. We also believe all health care policy in the United States, especially policies designed to create a system of universal health care, must include appropriate coverage for the health care of people with complex medical needs and protections for the civil rights of people with disabilities. By doing so, legislators can finally ensure that every American has access to health care. All must mean ALL.

Below, please find a summary of the top three areas of concern for our community regarding the proposals for universal health care policies.

Long Term Services and Supports

  • In addition to traditional health care services, provision for Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS) MUST be included in any and all new health care policy in order to provide adequate support for, and protect the civil rights of, individuals with disabilities and complex medical needs.

  • Priority must be placed on providing LTSS services in the community and NOT in an institutional setting; we must reverse the existing, systemic “institutional bias.” Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) provide person-centered support for daily life activities and enable people with disabilities to remain in their homes and communities and engage in all aspects of everyday life - family, school, employment, and more. HCBS are more cost effective, provide better outcomes, and preserve the freedom, dignity, and civil rights of individuals needing care.

  • Any system must recognize and support the central role family caregivers play in planning for and providing Long Term Services and Supports.

  • For more information, please refer to the principles on including LTSS from the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities.

Continuity of Care

  • Sweeping changes to the way health care is delivered in our country will be disruptive. However, no change should disrupt the access to, or quality of, care for individuals with complex medical needs. Being able to continue seeing trusted specialists, access care centers, and obtain vital medications, equipment, supplies, therapies, private duty nursing and more, is a matter of life and death.

  • In the current system, Medicaid coverage for individuals with complex medical needs and disabilities is inconsistent and highly variable from state-to-state, even from individual-to-individual within states. It is essential that this inequity be eliminated to provide relief for those not yet covered without compromising the coverage of those who currently have their needs fully met.

Pharmaceuticals

  • We need to increase support for research and development of treatments and cures for illnesses and diseases from the very common to the exceedingly rare. The people who need these treatments and cures must also be able to afford them.   

  • People with complex medical needs use a wide variety of medications, some common, some less so. These diverse needs must be adequately considered when determining the list of prescription drugs comprising any formulary. Appropriate provisions should also exist for those needing medication not included in the formulary.

  • For the majority of pharmaceuticals, when research and development is predominantly funded by public dollars, we believe Medicare/the Government must be able to negotiate with drug companies to secure reasonable prices and prevent the price gouging of medications, like insulin and epipens. The recommendations on making medicines affordable developed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine offer some valuable suggestions.

  • For pharmaceuticals developed for rare/orphan disease, some of which are funded through “venture philanthropy” and other private sources (like medications for Cystic Fibrosis and targeted genetic medicines for cancers), a carefully considered approach must be developed to effectively support and incentivize innovation while controlling costs for this small, very diverse, rare patient population.

Please note: at this time, Little Lobbyists is not endorsing any specific plan or policy. This document is meant to outline our concerns and provide guidance for discussion regarding proposals for all new universal health care legislation.


LL_KidSpeakers_062618%2B%25281%2Bof%2B38%2529.jpg
The Disability Integration Act

Little Lobbyists know our children with complex medical needs and disabilities will grow up to be adults with complex medical needs and disabilities. This is why legislation like the Disability Integration Act, which seeks to end institutional bias and secure everyone’s right to choose to live in their communities instead of an institution - regardless of level of need - is so critical to protecting the civil rights our children deserve.

This year, on Martin Luther King Jr.s birthday, the Little Lobbyists were invited to speak at the re-introduction of the Disability Integration Act with members of ADAPT, NCIL, other disability rights advocates, and members of Congress. The following text is from Erin Gabriel’s speech, mom of Little Lobbyists Abby, Bridget, and Collin. Erin, who lives in Pennsylvania, was also asked to introduce Senator Bob Casey (PA) by the Senator himself before he gave his remarks in support of this bill, which he called and important piece of civil rights legislation befitting the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr..


Image Description: Elena Hung, Erin Gabriel, and Little Lobbyists Xiomara and Abby at the podium during the DIA day reintroduction program. They are accompanied by an ASL interpreter.

Image Description: Elena Hung, Erin Gabriel, and Little Lobbyists Xiomara and Abby at the podium during the DIA day reintroduction program. They are accompanied by an ASL interpreter.

I am the lucky mother of three beautifully autistic children, Collin, Bridget and Abby. Abby is my youngest. She is 9 years old.

In addition to being autistic, Abby is also Deaf-blind, nonverbal, uses a wheelchair and has a long list of medical symptoms that go along with her genetic diagnosis. She has a rare, progressive and degenerative syndrome that we are still trying to learn more about. Medically, Abby has had to go through a lot.

That said, she, in so many ways, is a story of everything that can go right with the system. Because of where we live in Pennsylvania, her hearing loss was found at birth and she immediately qualified for Early Intervention services as well as a home and community based Medicaid waiver for children with disabilities-Pennsylvania’s version of the Katie Beckett Waiver. We have been able to find therapies and treatments that have helped her – all while living at home with her family.

Abby’s syndrome is progressive. She will eventually lose much of what she has gained. Her seizures will return and intensify.  And as her disease progresses, we know she will need nursing care at home to help with her daily needs. With the waiver, we know that when the time comes, she will be able to access the care she needs until she turns 21.  

But our waiver is not available to every child like Abby. It varies significantly state by state. And without that waiver, insurance companies use an institutional bias and won’t provide the home care so many of our children need. That means they will pay for care in a nursing home, but not in your own home. It’s part of why we live 600 miles away from our family- because Abby’s access to care literally depends on her zip code.

And when she reaches adulthood, that waiver will go away. Her services will stop, including any therapy and nursing care she has. She will be put on a wait list that extends for years. Her health will continue to decline during that time, while she waits.

Right now, Abby is growing up in her community, with her family and friends. She goes everywhere with us. She enjoys shopping, going to movies, even going to some political events here and there. She travels. She goes swimming at our local lake. She snuggles with her dog at home. She rides all the rides at Idlewild (our local amusement park). She smiles and laughs and brightens the day of so many people around her. She LIVES her life with more spark than most people I know. She deserves to have that freedom to keep living in her community. To get a job if she can. To keep going out with her friends and to travel if she wants to.  

She deserves to have that choice and not be relegated to a nursing home at age 22 because of the services she will require. She deserves to actually live and not just exist. Abby and people like her deserve the right to that choice regardless of which state they happen to live in. This is why the Disability Integration Act is so important for our family, for Abby and for people like her.

The National Centers for Independent Living (NCIL) held an art contest last summer. My daughter, Bridget, entered. The contest was “What the DIA Means to Me.” After talking about it for a few minutes, Bridget knew exactly what it would mean to her. She drew a picture of herself and her little sister in a wheelchair with a nurse being shown to their table at a restaurant. Because, as she explained to me, “The DIA would mean I could visit Abby at her house and we could go to a restaurant or anywhere we want instead of being stuck in a boring nursing home.”  

The DIA means families can stay together and people with disabilities can participate in their communities and LIVE their lives. Just like every other American. — Erin Gabriel

Image Description: Abby’s sister Bridget with her award from NCIL and her award-winning artwork about “What the DIA Means to Me.”

Image Description: Abby’s sister Bridget with her award from NCIL and her award-winning artwork about “What the DIA Means to Me.”



Speaker of the House (by Stacy Staggs)

On January 3, 2019, the 116th Congress was sworn in, with Democratic party leadership.  At 4am I had yet to close my eyes, even though I had a full day ahead of me. I couldn’t sleep because January 3rd was the day we had worked for two years to reach.  The day the Nancy Pelosi regained reclaimed the gave and became Speaker of the House. This was the day that ended the Republican majority in all three branches of Federal Government.  We made it. Checks and balances have been brought back to the US Government.

Americans with pre-existing conditions, families with medically complex children and adults, people who are chronically ill and in need of sufficient healthcare, all relaxed just a bit, knowing that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will not be repealed by legislation for now.  I was one of them. My daughter Emma, a former 28 week micro-preemie twin along with her sister Sara, relies on the protections against pre-existing condition exclusions and the lifetime coverage limits the ACA put a stop to…

When Speaker Pelosi reclaimed her gavel I breathed a little easier knowing that the Republican party agenda to repeal the ACA  without a replacement cannot pass while the Democratic party leads one of the chambers of Congress. We saw that the GOP could not repeal the ACA even  when Republicans held the majority in both chambers, but the devastating threat constantly loomed. With Democrats in the majority of the House, the threat has been somewhat neutralized for now.  Instead of being on the defensive, we can resume and expand our plans to improve the framework and execution of the ACA instead of fighting off its demise.

I have never, in my 40+ years of life, followed politics so closely as I have over the past two years.  I have never been so personally impacted or attacked by members of my own government and my fellow citizens who support an agenda that includes removing healthcare and Medicaid supports for millions of families, including my own.  That is why I joined forces with the Little Lobbyists. I could not sit and remain silent as Emma’s right to access healthcare was attacked, belittled and dismissed as unimportant. My daughter is not expendable. None of our children should be thought of as a budget line item.

I was astounded when Speaker Pelosi shared credit for the Democrat’s victory with our Little Lobbyists,” in her first speech as Speaker to House Members and the American public. When she credited part of the progress we have made during these scary and tumultuous times to the Little Lobbyists it hit a lot of us like a lightning bolt!  It served as validation that the innumerable hours, late nights at our kitchen tables, butterflies as we approach the microphone to speak, or write to share stories about our families have, in fact, made a difference. In those early morning hours, between enteral tube feeds, checking ventilator settings, covering for another missed nursing shift, emergency room visits and lengthy inpatient stays, we realized that the time we have given in service of the Little Lobbyists goals have been an important part of the fight to stem the erosion of healthcare in our country.

We now have allies leading the US House of Representatives, and no greater champion than Speaker Pelosi. January 3rd was the day the landscape has changed. It was the day we have had circled on our calendars since before the midterm elections.  The day everything changed.

Stacy’s daughter Emma is the reason she cannot sit and stay silent.

Stacy’s daughter Emma is the reason she cannot sit and stay silent.

Little Lobbyists Statement on Short Term Limited Duration Insurance CMS-9924-P (STATEMENT)

Submitted to www.regulations.gov/docket?D=CMS-2018-0015 April 19, 2018

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Department of Health and Human Services
Attention: CMS-9924-P

Little Lobbyists is an organization of families with one thing in common: we all have medically complex children requiring significant medical care.  Our mission is to advocate on behalf of the millions of such children across the country to ensure that their stories are heard and their access to quality health care is protected.  

America badly needs changes to health care laws and regulations that expand access to care and decrease costs; however, these changes must not come at the expense of necessary care and financial protections for vulnerable children and their families.  Unfortunately, that is just what the proposed rule would do. By allowing “short term” insurance plans for up to a year in length that would not contain basic protections provided by the Affordable Care Act – including the prohibition on discrimination against individuals with preexisting conditions and the prohibition of annual caps on medical care – children with complex medical needs across the country, and their families, will be harmed in multiple ways.  

As is the case with many medical conditions, parents of children with complex medical needs are frequently not in the position to know about and anticipate the care their children will need, through no fault of their own.  For such families, the protections afforded by the Affordable Care Act are literally life-saving. Children born prematurely, or with other complex medical needs, often require extended hospital stays with medical care billed into the millions of dollars.  The need for comprehensive medical care frequently continues long after they are finally discharged home. The protections in the Affordable Care Act ensure that insurance providers cannot deny coverage for medical care because their medical bills reach a certain threshold.  It ensures that they have access to lifesaving prescription drugs. It ensures that the preexisting conditions these children are born with will not prevent their ability to access care into the future.

The “short-term” insurance plans proposed in this rule eviscerates those protections.  Families purchasing such plans for health coverage, whose children subsequently encounter medical difficulties, will soon find these insurance plans to be worthless – failing to cover the specific, life-saving care their child needs, and taking coverage away completely if care becomes too expensive.  On top of the trauma and stress that comes with a sick child, these families will face financial ruin as well. While our focus is on medically complex children, this outcome is no less true for any individual who encounters unforeseen medical complications, be it through sickness or an accident.

The damage would not be limited to those families buying short-term plans created by this proposed rule.  For those families that remain in ACA-compliant plans to ensure they receive the care their child needs, the cost of insurance premiums would increase, leading to financial hardship – realities that the proposed rule explicitly concedes.  Once again, children and families who are most in need of care and financial protection will be the most negatively affected.

As we stated at the outset, America’s health insurance system needs fixing.  Access to care must be expanded so that all Americans can receive the care they require, and the cost of this care must be controlled so that financial hardship and bankruptcy due to medical care is reduced to a terrible relic of bygone days.  There are ways of meeting this vital goal. Americans demand it. Unfortunately, this proposed rule, which provides a path to less comprehensive care and higher medical costs for our nation’s most vulnerable, is a harmful leap backwards.

On behalf of the millions of children with complex medical needs and their families, we ask that the proposed rule be rescinded and replaced by one that truly sets access to comprehensive and affordable health care for all Americans as its cornerstone.

HR 620, Call to Action (by Ben Zeitler)

Friends of Little Lobbyists:

My son, Pierce, is four. He enjoys school tremendously. He is in his terrible fours, which he carried over from being three. He is extremely opinionated. Pierce just wants to play with his friends and his toys and terrorize his parents, like any good four year old does. He is learning and growing and doing great. Pierce also has some medical complexities: he cannot hold his own body up, is deafblind, has a tracheostomy, is fed through a tube, and relies on a wheelchair to get around. He is non-verbal. Even with everything just mentioned, Pierce is really just a normal kid. He is thriving in large part due to his resilience, but also because of the protections afforded him by both the Affordable Care Act and access to buildings and services because of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  The ADA gives people with disabilities equal access to things that may not have been accessible prior to 1990.  For example, this means that when my family visits a restaurant, we know that there will be a wheelchair accessible entrance we can use. There are many children similar to Pierce and unfortunately, the US House of Representatives, in late 2017, passed a bill through the House Judiciary Committee which could make it harder for families with children who are medically complex, as well as others with disabilities, to have access to the same spaces as everyone else. It died down for a while, but now this bill is back and could be brought to a floor vote as soon at 2/14/2018 or 2/15/2018.

Sometimes it is difficult for our children to do things because their equipment is big and bulky; they sometimes can’t go up or down stairs, or squeeze into small spaces. They sometimes struggle to have access to the same businesses, schools, education, and restaurants that everyone else can easily attain. Now some members of the House want to make it harder. We shouldn’t stand for that.

The bill is called H.R. 620 – The ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017. The bill doesn’t really focus on education though. Instead, it is a way for businesses to delay, or get out of, making accommodations for people with disabilities by putting the onus on the victim, not the business. The basics of the bill require the person who is aggrieved or doesn’t have access (as is now protected by law) to find out who the owner is, write a letter (including referring to the section of the ADA the owner is not following), wait up to 60 days, receive a letter, wait up to 120 more days and then take them to court. Even then, if the business has shown to have made “substantial progress” then the case can be thrown out. This is hard and confusing to understand, not to mention completely unreasonable for a non-attorney to complete on their own. This means that if, for example, your child’s therapist is in a building without a ramp, the owner wouldn’t have to build one right away. They could delay for six months and there is nothing that you or a lawyer could do about it. HR 620 would prevent you from being able to bring forth a lawsuit immediately. Basically, your legislators want the person who was discriminated against, and doesn’t have equal access, to wait. Someone who is of a different race or creed would not have to wait six months to file suit if they were turned away service or had to sit in a different section of a restaurant. It is not right that people with disabilities must wait six months (or more) for access.

Instead of making things better for our kids (and adults – who they will all eventually become) who have complex medical needs, this law would make it harder. This law would allow people to discriminate against our children and make them wait for equal access. This should not be tolerated. I do not want my son to be considered a second-class citizen. I want him to have all the access that anyone else does.

Supporters of this law have argued that it would provide reduce frivolous lawsuits and give businesses the chance to comply with the law rather than being sued immediately. The thing is, there are not many frivolous lawsuits to begin with. Furthermore, business owners and the Federal Government have had almost 30 years to understand and get used to the ADA. Everyone knows what it is and what the rules are. This bill is not going to make things better for people with disabilities. It is just going to make everything less accessible and less equal by delaying and stalling and treating my child like someone who doesn’t deserve access like everyone else. I will not stand for this. YOUshould not stand for this.

Please call your House representative and urge them to vote no on this bill. You can reach the congressional switchboard at 202.224.3121 and provide them your ZIP code and they will connect you to your representative. You can also go to http://www.house.gov and in the upper right corner enter your ZIP code to get your representative so you can contact them directly via phone or email or at a town hall. If you would like more information about H.R. 620 – The ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017, below are some resources.

Resources:

LegislationLaura Hatcher
Little Lobbyists’ Letter to U.S. Senators on the Graham-Cassidy health care repeal bill

Below is a copy of the letter that we have been delivering to U.S. Senators regarding our opposition to the Graham-Cassidy bill:

FullSizeRender_2.jpg


September 18, 2017

Dear Senator,

Little Lobbyists is an organization of families with one thing in common: we all have medically complex children requiring significant medical care.  Our mission is to advocate on behalf of the millions of such children across the country to ensure that their stories are heard and their access to quality health care is protected.  We have visited your office previously and hand-delivered the stories of medically complex children in your state whose health and future would have been jeopardized by the legislation under consideration at the time.

We write again because the pending Cassidy-Graham health care bill poses similar danger to the millions of medically complex children in this country, thousands of whom live in your state.  We ask that you stand up to protect our children, and demand that Congress do the same.   

Our current health care laws can and must be improved, about this there is no debate.  However, the Cassidy-Graham bill departs from recent good faith, bipartisan efforts and attempts a massive upheaval of our health care system without input from policy experts or those who would be most affected by its provisions.  In particular, the Cassidy-Graham bill undermines three protections in current law that are vital to the health and well-being of medically complex children and their families:  

  • Decreased Medicaid funding through “per capita caps” and “block grants”. Private insurance frequently does not cover home/community-based care (such as private duty nursing) and therapeutic care. Medicaid fills this gap, which allows medically complex children not only to live at home, but to thrive. Cassidy-Graham’s upheaval of Medicaid will cut billions of dollars nationally from the program relative to current law, with no guarantees that the funds must be spent on the same population. Under such funding restrictions, optional Medicaid programs, such as the Katie Beckett Medicaid waiver program created by Ronald Reagan to help families care for their medically complex children at home, will likely be among the first eliminated. In short, under Cassidy-Graham, the vital safety net that Medicaid provides our children is slowly pulled away, with families like ours left to worry constantly whether it will be there when they need it.

  • Eliminating the ban on annual/lifetime limits. Many of our children accumulated millions of dollars in medical bills in their infancy before they ever left the hospital. Under the ACA, insurance companies were prohibited from kicking our children off of insurance plans when their care reached a certain dollar amount. Cassidy-Graham would allow states the ability to waive these protections. This means that parents across the nation sitting bedside in Neonatal Intensive Care Units will once again have to worry not only about whether their child will survive, but also whether the hospital stay will leave them bankrupt.

  • Eliminating the ACA’s pre-existing condition protections. Medically complex children are frequently born with multiple pre-existing conditions. Protections against discrimination on the basis of these conditions give us the security that our children will not one day be denied affordable insurance because of conditions they were born with. That security is stolen by the Graham-Cassidy bill, giving states broad authority to waive these protections. This is contrary to the Republican Party’s own platform, which provides that “individuals with preexisting conditions who maintain continuous coverage should be protected from discrimination.”

We have heard politicians over the past few days tell us that the Cassidy-Graham bill will increase “flexibility” and “choice” for Americans.  That is flatly untrue for our families.  Rather, the bill’s provisions will fundamentally disrupt the safety net that our families depend on, likely leaving us only one unthinkable choice: incur debt far beyond our means, or forego medical care that will keep our children alive and able to achieve their God-given potential.

As we said at the outset, our nation’s health care laws can and must be fixed.  But it is unjust, immoral, and contrary to any reasonable meaning of “pro-life” to pass a health care law that makes it harder for medically complex children to access the care they need to survive and thrive.  Our children have done nothing wrong.  They do not lack personal responsibility; indeed, they show more strength, bravery, and resiliency in a single hospital visit than many people do in their entire lives.  They are just kids who, through no fault of their own, need a little help.  

You can help them now.  Stand with our children.  Hear their stories.  Work with us to ensure their access to health care is not diminished.  We will make ourselves available anytime of any day to discuss our concerns with you in person, and to assist in any way we can toward the goal of a health care system that works better for all Americans. 

Sincerely,

Elena Hung
Michelle Morrison
Co-Founders, Little Lobbyists

Austin Carrigg, Anna Kruck Corbin, Laura LeBrun Hatcher, Ben Zeitler
Steering Committee, Little Lobbyists